So, is Rangers Football Club in
administration or not? On 9 March, the
then administrators returned to the Court of Session seeking an administration
order against the company. But the
company had already entered administration on 14 February. Or had it?
On 9 March, the court issued an order,
appointing Mr Clark and Mr Whitehouse of Duff and Phelps, ‘Joint interim
managers’ of the club.
So what’s going on? Are Rangers in administration or not? You will look in vain on either the club’s
website or the interim managers’ website for the answer. There’s a black hole where information should
be.
The interim manager is a strange and unusual
beast. The Court usually makes such an
appointment when it has been presented with a petition asking for an
administration order but in circumstances when it does not have enough information
to allow it to make a decision. However,
the court recognises that if such a petition has been presented, it may be
prudent to appoint a person to take control of the company and manage its
affairs until such time as the court hears all relevant evidence which will
allow it to decide whether an administrator should be appointed. And people appointed under these
circumstances are known as ‘Interim Managers’.
And that’s what Messrs Clark and Whitehouse
now are. However, normally an insolvency
practitioner would move from being appointed Interim Manager to being appointed
as Administrator. But Messrs Clark and
Whitehouse appear to have gone backwards!
So, in layman’s terms, what on earth does
this mean for Rangers Football Club?
It’s difficult to say.
It seems that Rangers Football Club was
previously registered with the Financial Services Authority, most likely in
connection with the Rangers Credit Card.
If a company is registered with the FSA, it must notify them before it
appoints administrators and have the FSA’s agreement to the appointment. This formality appears to have been
overlooked.
The return to Court of Session by the
erstwhile administrators is likely to be an effort to obtain retrospective
ratification of their appointment.
But where does that leave them meantime? In a statement to the press, they say that “It is envisaged that this hearing is a
formality and that the process will not impact in any way the progress of the
insolvency”. .In the meantime, they remain interim managers.
The terms of the
court order certainly gives them the same powers as administrators but experts in insolvency
law take the view that the role of the interim manager is not without its
problems. In a text book co-authored by one of Scotland’s foremost insolvency
judges, he notes that ‘interim managers are likely to be within the definition
of shadow directors……and as such may be exposed to an action for wrongful
trading if they allow the company to trade for any significant length of time,
given that it is insolvent.’
Shadow directors are defined as people ‘in
accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of the company
are accustomed to act’. So, although
they may have the same powers as
administrators, and that would include a power to sell the club, it could be
argued that they are considerably more exposed
than an administrator would be. There is
no doubt Rangers is an insolvent business.
If the interim managers are to sleep easily in their beds, we can only
hope that the salary cuts agreed by playing and non-playing staff are enough to
stem the losses of £1m per month.
Otherwise, a disgruntled creditor might just decide to argue that the
interim managers are acting as shadow directors and not as administrators and
to hold them liable for losses in the meantime should the club go into
liquidation.
So, is the club in administration or
not? Arguably not. Although an administration order was made, it
is not valid, or at least, the purported administrators have not been validly
appointed. Does that mean the actions
they have taken since February 14 can be challenged? Probably not, but most insolvency professionals
will be breathing a huge sigh of relief that they are not in the centre of this
complex web of confusion.
Multi-level marketing (MLM) is a marketing strategy in which the sales force is compensated not only for sales they personally generate, but also for the sales of the other salespeople that they recruit.Nice post.
ReplyDeletemlm solution